School. Idea of God.
Author: admin/16-04-2012, 21:57 / Category:---
School 4. Ideas of God.
Continuing conversation on base world outlook provisions (codes) not the superfluous will remind of what they form our thinking and the relation to the world, and, in much bigger degree, than ideological (formulated by means of words) installations. Evident mythological images influence our thinking, rather than dry verbal formulations more strongly. In this regard national fairy tales, legends, traditions have bigger value, than it can seem at first sight.
One of the central places in outlook of the person occupies idea of God which is very important since forms the relation of the person with the highest, enduring reality that in turn, certainly, defines the relation of the person to, to the nature and to society. This point of view is shared by modern theologians. So, the professor of the Moscow Spiritual Academy and Seminary Alexey Ilyich Osipov argues: «Ideas of God define all character, a system and the direction of our human life. God is a shrine for us and according to this shrine we and we carry out the life». «Ideas of God it is cultivated passions and the person lives according to cultivated image of God» (Idea of God. Osipov A.I. prof. Well.
http://video.mail.ru/mail/helen_joy/477/481.html).
Libraries of the world are filled with religious literature of theologians – interpreters of the "sacred" writing. It is very difficult to majority of believers to understand subtleties of various treatments of "Holy Writ" because they actually are sophistical idle talks behind which there is no depth of thought. Therefore here we will analyze not ideological reasonings of sophisticated theologians in the art, and the simple visions informed to us by "Holy Writ" or spiritual tradition, remained both in oral, and in written culture of the people.
In Ossetian religious culture, despite abundance of monuments of oral national creativity, the main source of idea of God nevertheless is religious (transpersonal) experience which in tradition is understood as unity understanding with Divine essence. These representations, as well as ways of mastering by necessary conditions, are Basic Elements of outlook which are formed in the course of practical prayful ritual.
It is necessary to note that the subject of an image of God isn't especially "generously" discussed" in legends the Ossetian (in comparison with the Bible), but even in available not numerous narrations contours of representations of our ancestors about the Founder rather accurately appear. Here one of the brightest, in our opinion, fragments: «Hutsau æй duyny сæр. Дуйнейæн æ райдайæн æмææ кæрон. … Hutsau æхецæн цæрæн бунат исаккаг кодта æгас duyny рохс. Duynya рохси къабæзтæ – тухтæ æнцæ, арв, дунгæ, зæнхæ, Don æмæ a zing». (God to all head. It "beginning" and "termination" of the world (Universe). The most suitable place for the «Ob
For "dwelling" God chose as the most suitable place World Light. Parts of this Light (its derivatives) are various forces, the sky, the earth, a wind (air), water, fire). (Gardanti Michal. «Уадзимистæ». Дзæугигъæу2007. Page 389) Here can remember as also legends an origin of the sledge which ancestor was «артæй гуырд Сæуæссæ», and the foremother «донбетыры чызг», (is present the symbolics of fire and water which as it was noted, are Light derivatives). Is in oral legends and such: «Hutsau фæлдист at duyny рохсæй мæ æй duyny рохс». (God arose from Universal Light, It and is Universal Light). (in the same place) All this in total understanding gives us representation that God is Light and, even, more deeply and more mysteriously, than Light, such that it is impossible to describe something words but that there is a basis of all and is shown in all the real.
On the basis of oral legends it is possible to understand that Light and is "Body" of God, and respectively, all world surrounding us is transformed "Body" of God. God gives "Body" - Light to the victim and it will be transformed to the World perceived by us. At all this God keeps the essence of the creator and the highest Consciousness (Maun). A symbol of such representation is the body of the sacrificial animal which parts are distributed on an altar – фынг (е) on hierarchy, thus the head of an animal symbolizing the highest principle, eat only next day after the Sacred meal. The head as a symbol of the highest beginning supervising the World created by it, in traditional representation the Ossetian remains the most esteemed object. Surprisingly eloquent symbolism almost not translated by means of words! The deepest according to the contents is also the symbol of the organization of the world, shown in sacrificial pies (see about it the previous publications).
The episode of creation of the Universe, described in the Nartsky epos where it is said that before this illusory World - «мæнг Дуне» - was «sleeping, dark and mute» is interesting also. (Sledge каджытæ. Т.1 Ir 1989г. Page 14) And here from depth of this sleeping World arises Light which is giving rise to all variety of things and the phenomena. There is a True World of Light (Rukhs Donne, Æссæг Donne), not available to daily understanding. God is shown from this unknown to us the World in the form of Light and creates the diverse World of things realized by us and the phenomena.
On the basis of given above images it is possible to argue unequivocally that in the most ancient traditional doctrine there is a clear idea of God, that God is present at Everything and Everything is manifestation of God that God Vseobjemlyushch, is eternal and there is no equal to It, for God Light, life, essence. God is the Life source, the reason of all beings. As though we tried to describe it, there is no the way allowing adequately it to make. It can't be placed in a framework of foreseeable space and time.
God, from the point of view of traditional religious culture, not the murderer, not the avenger, not the sly fellow, not the adherent. «Huytsau тыхгæнæг нæ фæцæуы, probe фæамоны». (Tsartsiata таурæгътæ. Iran адæмы epos. ĺæÒñªÙÕÛæÒ 2007. Page 26), говHe speaks зэдам and дауагам on their request to kill one of heroes of the epos. God allocates people addressing to it with knowledge in which the happiness and wellbeing – фарн is concluded (and). God is Rest and the Benefit. God acquaints people with good fortune (фарн) which starts with It. The evil appears in ignorance (фыдзонд) when the person loses touch good luck, is discharged of It, from his wisdom.
Interest represents "management style" of God which is presented to consciousness of traditional society in oral national legends. Here one of typical pictures of such management: «Уæд уæларв хуыцауы бадæнты уыди æмбырд. Uytsa Huytsau's æмбырды дзырд радта йæ зæдтæн, йæ дауджытæн.
– Тæригъæдæй Mary быдыры астæу Sau Æлдары фырт. Æвирхъау хъуыддаг ын бакодта йæ хæрамзæрдæ фыд. Ноджы йын æнцад cash уадзы йæ цыппар moustaches, хæст сыл самадта, тыхсын сæ кæны. Чи уæ бахуыс кæнид uyets мæгуыртæн.
Уæд Uastyrdzhi загъта.
– Donne Дарæг, Donne Уыромæг стыр Huytsau мæн æм арвит, æз ын бакæнинаг дæн цы мын зæгъай uy.
– Уæдæ афтæ фæуæд. Уымæн хос мæ куыхы дæр нæй, йæ хос дæлдзæхы Хадзымæ. Цæугæ уырдæм. Hadza дын радзæн дыуæ тæгæры сыфы, uydon-iu лæппуйы цæстытыл авæр, æмæ uy ракæсдзæн».
(Then the throne of God had a collecting. On this collecting God pledged a word created by it зэдам and дауагам.
- It is a pity Black Aldar's son dies among a field. With it his mean father badly arrived. In addition doesn't leave alone his four wives, war organized against them, prevents them to live quietly. Who can help it?
Then Uastyrdzhi told:
- Send me the Almighty, the Founder of the Universe, I am ready to make everything that you will tell.
- Let will be so. It can be helped by a maple leaf which is stored in a vault at Haza. Put it to eyes of the young man and it will find again sight.) (Tsotsko's Æмбалты. «Удвæрны хæзнатæ». ĺæÒñªÙ¬ÛæÒ 2009. «Sau æлдары аргъæу». Page 35)
Pictures of the Nartsky epos show that God created the world perfect, allocated the creations with a certain measure and the right (a bar – the right; a bar a slovoobrazuyushchy root in words: бæрц, барын – a measure to measure). In the world created by It, everything is perfect and counterbalanced and copes as though "by itself". God himself doesn't interfere with management process, but deeply penetrates into the events. It gives the chance to the creations allocated from it with a certain gift (a measure, the right), to see, solve and exercise administration on "site" "entrusted" them. It is quiet and has no passions. Itself doesn't assume the functions granted to forces created by it and creations. Thus nothing can escape from its Attention and Will.
In the book "Writer Stalin" known Israeli Slavist Mikhail Vayskopf (Mikhail Vayskopf. "Writer Stalin". New literary review. M, 2001г. Page 181-198), analyzing an idiolect (a special combination of words and expressions, characteristic for this person) Stalin, on purpose to understand deep structures of his outlook, came to a conclusion that the folklore basis of the Stalin personality went back to the Nartsky epos. Nartsky epos was specified by Vayskopf as one
ayskopfy as one of three sources of formation of the identity of Stalin.
Anatoly Wasserman arguing on Stalin's management, speaks: «Now there are very rough disputes of that in a methodical grant to one of versions of the textbook of history is told that Stalin was the effective manager. But, unfortunately, not all understand that is put in this phrase. The most part of the people considers that it means as if it effectively used repressions for advance of certain nation-wide purposes. And so I very much wanted to work under the direction of such manager because it took not repressions. It took penetration into the main point and extensive consultations of all experts, anyway, connected with a solved question. (Anatoly Wasserman. «Stalin the most effective manager».
http://www.russia.ru/video/diskurs_9135/).
Comparing Stalin's management style to the management style presented in the Nartsky epos, it is possible to agree with Mikhail Vayskopf's conclusions. M. Vayskopf is right concerning sources of an idiolect of Stalin. It proves to be true the analysis of the most wide spiritual and administrative experience containing in depths of nartsky heritage.
Wishing to receive doubtful political dividends some modern applicants for spiritual leadership try to deprive our young generation of communication with cultural and spiritual heritage of the people, putting some idea to it that Ossetians allegedly historically Christians or Muslims. A natural consequence of it is substitution of world outlook values. Ideals come to change of traditions of ancestors and values of other people. And matter is not in volume, they are bad or are good, they simply others and, therefore, adhering to these views we cease to be oneself, we cease to be keepers and successors of the most ancient culture.
Now we suggest to consider attentively that palm off on the people instead of its true cultural values, that is imposed to adults and children as the best examples of spirituality and moral.
For a start we will consider bible "pictures" which irrespective of our desires form in our consciousness an image of God, and consequently and (according to Osipov A.I.) image of our behavioural reference point.
«Also heard a voice of the Lord going in paradise during a cool of day; Adam and his wife on behalf of the Lord between paradise trees also disappeared. The Lord also appealed to Adam, and told to it: where are you?» (Life 3; 8,9). Apparently, God bible isn't ubiquitous, It goes in a cool (as the person) and looks for Adam. … «Here, Adam became as one of Us, knowing the good and evil; and now, it as though didn't stretch the hand, and didn't take also from a life tree, both didn't taste, and didn't begin to live eternally» (the Life. 3, 22). Bible God, thus, still feels also concern: as though the person didn't seize divine possibilities. … And here other fragment: «24 Also there was Iakov one. Somebody also fought against it before emergence of a dawn; 25 and, having seen that doesn't overcome it, concerned structure of a hip it and damaged hip structure at Iakov when he fought against It. 26
Also told to [it]: release Me for there ascended a dawn. Iakov told: I will not release You, yet you will not bless me. 27 Also told: how your name? He told: Iakov. 28 Also told to [it]: from now on the name to you will be not Iakov, and Israel for you fought good luck, and человеков will overcome. 29 Iakov Asked, speaking: tell to [me] the name Your. And He told: on what you ask about my name? [it is wonderful.] Also blessed him there. 30 Iakov Also named a name to a place to that: Penuel; for, he spoke, I saw God face to face, and my soul» (Life 22) remained. The person perceiving similar "pictures" has mixed feelings. God isn't powerful, can't overcome the person also it is alien to the nature because is afraid of light of day and operates at night. (Here as required it would be desirable to pay attention that the same fragment in the Torah looks in a different way:« Not Iakov there should be your name, and Israel for you competed with an angel. … Iakov also named a name to a place to that Pniel, for:« I saw an angel face to face and survived» (Vaishlakh 32; 28-31). Apparently in this fragment it is a question of an angel, instead of about God that forms other relation to the highest forces.) … «And at midnight the Lord struck all first-borns (children) in the earth Egyptian, from the first-born of the Pharaoh sitting on the throne, to the first-born of the prisoner being in a dungeon, and all first-born of cattle» (the Outcome 12; 29). It is obvious that in bible representation God also the infanticide. Terrible and ruthless, it strikes not only children human, but also cubs of cattle. Why such cruelty and to whom these victims are necessary? These questions set the reader of the "sacred" writing. … "Lord" speaks to Moisey: Inspire to the people that everyone at the near and each woman at the near, elicited things silver and things gold. … Sons израилевы by Moisey's word also made and asked from Egyptians of things silver, things gold and clothes. The Lord gave favor to the people in the opinion of Egyptians, and they gave it, and it gathered Egyptians» (the Outcome 11, 2; 12,35) Here to us idea of God, as an artful being who learns to gather kind people opens. Let somebody at the neighbor will try to go and elicit gold and silver things. Who will give? Only very kind and sincere persons who really love you and sympathize with you. And (judging by that is told in the bible) God, to the people orders to gather these people. … «The people began to grumble aloud. … We remember fish whom in Egypt we ate with gift, cucumbers and melons, both onions and onions and garlic. … And the Lord heard and his anger ignited. At them Lord's fire also ignited, and started to exterminate camp edge. … will eat meat. As you cried aloud misters and spoke:« who will feed us meat? It was good to us in Egypt», - that and the Lord will give you meat, and will eat, not two days, not five days, not ten days and not twenty days; but the whole month while it won't go from your nostrils …» (Numbers 11; 1,5, 18,19,20). And here, God предстаёт as violent and angry teacher. It could give meat for a change food, but it gives so that unfortunate people didn't dare about h
He is irritated by requests of people. … He has as well a feeling of hatred: «I loved Iakov, and Isava began to hate» (It is small. 1, 2-3). He demands this hatred and from esteeming it: «Whether to me to begin to hate hating You, My God, and not возгнушаться rising on you? Full hatred I hate them; enemies they to me» (Ps. 138, 21-22). … Farther it is more:« Also there was to me a word Lord's: 2. son human! there were two women, daughters of one mother, 3. they also fornicated in Egypt, fornicated in the youth; there their breasts are crumpled, and virgin sosets there corrupted them. 4. Names to them: Ogola, and her sister - Ogoliva. 5. Ogola from Me also began to fornicate and conceived a liking for the lovers …, 9. For that I also gave of it in charge lovers it, … 10. They … killed her a sword». (Иезекииль16). God is in the form of the person, It gets to itself(himself) wives, and It isn't so perfect, as wives look for for themselves that - that more interesting. 11. Her sister, Ogoliva, saw it, and still razvrashchenny was in the love, and the bluzheniye surpassed it bluzheny sisters it. the flesh also conceived a liking for the lovers, at which - a flesh asinine, and lust, as at stallions. (Иезекииль23). Continuation of this narration as indicates to us imperfection of God, moreover, seemingly, that he feels an inferiority complex. 22. Therefore, Ogoliva the Lord so speaks: here, I will raise against you your lovers, …. 25. Also I will turn my jealousy against you, and will arrive with you furiously: will cut off at you a nose and ears, and other yours from a sword will fall; will take your sons and your daughters, and other yours fire will be devoured; 48. So I will put an end to libertinism on this earth, and all women will accept a lesson, and won't do sramny affairs like you; 49. also will assign to you your libertinism, and will be punished for sins with your idols, and learn that I am Lord». (Иезекииль23) God is jealous, vindictive and cruel. … «The Lord was with Judas, and It seized the mountain. But inhabitants of a valley couldn't banish; because they had iron chariots.» (Book. Judges Izrailevs 1; 19) And here God isn't all-powerful and it appears is helpless before iron chariots, before creation of hands human.
… The following fragment from the New Testament: «I am sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Izrailev. And она* having approached bowed to It and spoke: My God! Help me. He told in reply: it is not good to take from children ** and to throw to dogs ***». (From Matfey 15; 24,26). Jesus as the God's son is selective on an ethnic sign and doesn't want to recognize existence of internal advantage at "not electee" of the people. … «If who comes to Me, and won't begin to hate the father and mother, and the wife and children, and brothers and sisters, and besides and the life, that can't be my pupil» (From Luki:14, 26), Jesus acts as the opponent of a family and calls for refusal of a family. The obligation to "hate" the parents and the life corresponds with the obligation to throw everything and to follow, having taken the cross, for the teacher. To those who wants to reproach us with misunderstanding of Bible "allegories" we will remind of that that: The Trentsky cathedral in the tenth canon confirmed,
in peak to reformers, «an anathema to the one who says that marriage is higher than virginity or a celibacy or that is better also pokhvalny to marry, than to stay in a virginity or celibacy condition». …« God chose not wise the world to shame wise … and nothing meaning God chose to abolish the meaning. That no flesh was praised before God». (the 1st to Corinthians 1; 27-29). And here, we see the jealous God who is not granting knowledge, and "abolishing" them.
__________________________
* hananeyanka (примеч. author)
** сыновИзраиля *** not to Jews
Such "pictures" and descriptions of God it is possible to find in the Bible much. The most interesting is that in bible images we recognize our contemporaries who accepted or haven't accepted Christianity, but thus apprehended in the course of education and education some Christian ideas or close to them materialistic, having gathered them also from mass media and works of art. These pictures of bible life remind us of our some modern heads who are zealously standing up for the Christian sermon, fathers rejecting thus the pure doctrine. Having put on another's dress, they also behave as appropriate: aren't reserved in the feelings, are intolerant of dissent, are irascible, false in speeches, are diffident, care only of the wellbeing to the detriment of general welfare, being irritated thus on people "complaining". We are once again convinced here of Osipov A.I. correctness.: «the person lives according to cultivated image of God».
We pay attention of the reader and to other fact. When Christian, in particular orthodox, theologians interpret God, their representations appear absolutely others, than that arise at visualization of "pictures" described in the Bible. Christian God has more similarities to ideas of God, starting with "pictures" of Indo-European heritage, i.e. from religion which they call "pagan". So, in one of lectures Danielle Sysoyev's priest describes God as follows:« God the highest, eternal, invariable, God isn't described neither space, nor mind because it is spirit uniform, eternal incorporeal, invariable vseblagy, ruling, wise, invisible and not achievable and in anything not needing, It is a clemency and truth source, light intellectual and unapproachable, Force any measure not defined and only actually will measured, Everything that he will want can. Force it gets into all of essence itself, remaining pure. Establishes all of the administration and ranks. And itself is above all the administration and a rank. God light, itself clemency, life, love, itself essence. Itself there is a life source, the reason of all benefits for all beings call it Love. Because it долготерпит, isn't extolled, doesn't rejoice to a lie. But rejoices to truth, everything covers, to everything trusts, always hopes and his love never disappears. He won't love (as in Islam) He already loves the creation for he created it. His love more initially than creation, It attaches to pleasure, which in it. It all объ
fills also with anything it is not embraced. It doesn't create the evil, because the evil has no essence. This ugliness a shortcoming, lameness, an illness is malicious. Lawlessness which arises because free beings abuse the freedom. The Lord renders for malicious affairs. God the Almighty over everything commanding, and reigning a kingdom. Has no rival and there is nobody soravny to it. (
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFAyp_ID39s)
In the previous articles we said that the ideology is born from outlook. Here we see notable contradictions between ideological formulas and world outlook images. There is a lawful question: how such can be? If the doctrine is complete, the ideology should reflect outlook! The outlook as it was told earlier, influences our behavior much more strongly, than ideological formulas. Certificates to it suffices if attentively to look around and to analyse daily experience of public life. It is enough to look at how the general hobby for Christianity or materialism brings customs of people into accord with the moral qualities presented in "pictures" of the bible. We realize that today it is difficult to find the people who are guided by idealization of divine qualities about whom theologians speak. These theologians from where scoop the images representing Christian God? Why the declared image of Christian God is so similar to an image of other God ("pagan") which very much isn't similar to God presented in the Bible?
The answer to this question can be found at known European thinkers. It is enough to mention in this regard Arnold Van Gennep, P. Santiva (Emil Nurri) and Paul Sebiyo's compositions, shown in the works as the Church originally furiously fighting against "pagan" folk customs, appeared it is compelled to "acquire" subsequently them, it is more or less superficial христианизировав and as these customs lived, sometimes in very bright look, up to now. "Assimilation", certainly, concerns not only external ceremonialism and customs, but also the semantic contents. Alain de Benois in the work «Can how be a pagan» writes: «Hristianizatsiya caused process European псевдоморфоза owing to what there was a number of the interactions which have generated, finally, hybrid religious category. After a hristianizatsiya of Europe neither the European culture, nor Christianity more didn't correspond to the roots and own "nature".« Theoretically, – Julius Evola writes, – Europe accepted Christianity..., but practically Europe remained pagan. The hybrid» as a result turned out. The Christianity in a certain degree changed – at least temporarily – the European person. As O. Spengler noticed in «the Decline of Europe», «the European person too changed Christianity». «As to paganism, – Maurice Bella writes, – that the Christian belief simply came of it in the stead isn't so obvious. In certain cases it is only a Christian cover on the ancient religious basis, оставши
«Exactly being based on this supervision a number of authors, declared - as Erich Fromm writes, - that Europe never was rather Christian in spite of the fact that during certain eras and in certain places it was completely impregnated with the belief which is officially approving the Christian character. Thus, the address of Europe to Christianity «substantially was only visibility». To Sigrid Hunka – one of few researchers who are systematically studying this subject, showed a considerable convergence between «great objections», put forward within centuries against the dominating ideology presented by official belief. In this convergence she sees the spiritual continuity expressing lines of force of «other religion of Europe» – original religion of Europe, – religions which is shown at the end of the IV century in the doctrine Pelagia, again is shown in the IX century in Scott Eriugena's doctrine which is expressed since the XIV century by Maister Eckhart and his pupils (Henry Suzo, Johann Tauler, Sebastian Frank von Donauvert), Jacob Bema, Paracelsus, Ioakhim Florsky, Lucilio Vanini, Amalriky from Ben, David Dinat etc. and whose successors in different degree are both Erazm and Leonardo da Vinci, and Henry Moore, Shaftesbury, Valentin Vaygel, Pestalozzi, a German romantic and idealistic current in the main lines, Goethe, the Edging, Fichte, Schelling, Shleyermakher and Herder, Russian Feofan and Berdyaev, Frenchmen Teyar de Chardin and Saint-Exupéry etc. For all romantic tradition God and the Installed essence only different sides and different names same. Thus, that revives secret «religiousness of the world» which Edward Shpranger defines as the basis of "pagan" spirit and which modern source he sees in Goethe, and then in Shleyermakhera "." To consider God and the nature separately, – writes to Goethe in 1770, – it is difficult and dangerous: it all the same what to consider separately soul and a body while we learn soul only through a body, and God only through the nature "." How the nature out of us is possible?» – Schelling («A German science») asks (we will remind: the Christian theology considers God and his creation as an essence different). According to Herder, «The deity is shown integrally, that is by means of operating forces». Gegel argues that «To love God means to feel in infinite, plunging completely and entirely into life». Thus, "paganism" concludes the union, but not with distinct from the world the absolute, and with the world. It concludes the union with the earth:« To imagine God and the earth as the same idea» (Ranier Maria to Rilka). The matter and spirit, declares also Teyar, an essence not «two things», and «two conditions of one space fabric (...) a fabric of the Universe is the spirit matter». Klaudy Trezmontant writes: «Thus, in the world and by means of the world God reaches the highest status of the existence. God isn't separated from the world. At the same time it can't be confused to the world. God is depth of the world: it is higher than everything, but it not outside of everything. This statement name
«Exactly being based on this supervision a number of authors, declared - as Erich Fromm writes, - that Europe never was rather Christian in spite of the fact that during certain eras and in certain places it was completely impregnated with the belief which is officially approving the Christian character. Thus, the address of Europe to Christianity «substantially was only visibility». To Sigrid Hunka – one of few researchers who are systematically studying this subject, showed a considerable convergence between «great objections», put forward within centuries against the dominating ideology presented by official belief. In this convergence she sees the spiritual continuity expressing lines of force of «other religion of Europe» – original religion of Europe, – religions which is shown at the end of the IV century in the doctrine Pelagia, again is shown in the IX century in Scott Eriugena's doctrine which is expressed since the XIV century by Maister Eckhart and his pupils (Henry Suzo, Johann Tauler, Sebastian Frank von Donauvert), Jacob Bema, Paracelsus, Ioakhim Florsky, Lucilio Vanini, Amalriky from Ben, David Dinat etc. and whose successors in different degree are both Erazm and Leonardo da Vinci, and Henry Moore, Shaftesbury, Valentin Vaygel, Pestalozzi, a German romantic and idealistic current in the main lines, Goethe, the Edging, Fichte, Schelling, Shleyermakher and Herder, Russian Feofan and Berdyaev, Frenchmen Teyar de Chardin and Saint-Exupéry etc. For all romantic tradition God and the Installed essence only different sides and different names same. Thus, that revives secret «religiousness of the world» which Edward Shpranger defines as the basis of "pagan" spirit and which modern source he sees in Goethe, and then in Shleyermakhera "." To consider God and the nature separately, – writes to Goethe in 1770, – it is difficult and dangerous: it all the same what to consider separately soul and a body while we learn soul only through a body, and God only through the nature "." How the nature out of us is possible?» – Schelling («A German science») asks (we will remind: the Christian theology considers God and his creation as an essence different). According to Herder, «The deity is shown integrally, that is by means of operating forces». Gegel argues that «To love God means to feel in infinite, plunging completely and entirely into life». Thus, "paganism" concludes the union, but not with distinct from the world the absolute, and with the world. It concludes the union with the earth:« To imagine God and the earth as the same idea» (Ranier Maria to Rilka). The matter and spirit, declares also Teyar, an essence not «two things», and «two conditions of one space fabric (...) a fabric of the Universe is the spirit matter». Klaudy Trezmontant writes: «Thus, in the world and by means of the world God reaches the highest status of the existence. God isn't separated from the world. At the same time it can't be confused to the world. God is depth of the world: it is higher than everything, but it not outside of everything. This statement name
isn't a particle of divine essence». Maister Eckhart also opposes bible idea of the far God inaccessible to the person. In one of very bright fragments in "Fragments" he adds:« That I am a person, unites me with all people; that I see and I hear, I eat and I drink, unites me with all animals. But that I am I, concerns only me, treats me and to anybody to another, nor to any person, an angel or God, excepting that degree in what I am uniform with it». Johann Henry Pestalozzi argues:« Volya Boga and that the best that I can reach, an essence same "." So the idea that the person touches to divine when it gives the best from this that can give and when surpasses itself again proves to be true. In it consists deep – and deeply "pagan" – logic. The person should not only be oneself, correspond to "nature", he should aspire also to "super nature", to supermankind – to that supermankind, in preventing to which achievement iudeo-Christian monotheism sees if not the purpose, the calling» - is concluded by Alain de Benois. (The references which were had in the text to foreign authors are quoted according to Alyona de Benois book «It is possible how to be the pagan»
http://www.modernlib.ru/books/de_alen/k... ikom/read/)
Among other things we should remember that on Christianity and Christian ideology great and direct influence was rendered by ancient Iranian religious tradition. And, this influence was rather strong not only in the Middle East in origin of the Christian doctrine, but also in the Europe. So, the American researchers K.Scott Litlton and Linda A. Malkor in the work «From Skifiya to Camelot» showed that the legends extended among the Christian European people about the Bowl of Graal and King Arthur are obliged by the origin to Sarmatians and аланам childbirth which long time, in the Middle Ages, «were kept by the influence on church and the aristocracy». (K.Skot Litlton, Linda A. Malkor.« From Skifiya to Camelot». prod. Mendzher. 2007г. Page 317). Interestingly here and Getnik's remark, about that that «Graal from the very beginning was a sacred subject, but hadn't something in common with Christian belief. Representation that the knight of Graal – not the Christian, remained in the Welsh story "Peredur" (1300 – 1325гг.), where the hero can't answer Kai's questions because swore not to speak with Christians». (From Skifiya to Camelot. Page 281) And is interesting it to that clearly shows on real (not Christian) a source of knightly ideology and outlook. As to Russian Orthodoxy, it is known that in formation of the early Russian state active participation accepted the Sarmatian – аланы, carriers of the assovsky religious concept. E.S. Galkin writes about it:« The latest researches in the field of archeology, numismatics and эпиграфики confirmed reliability of mentions in the Arab-Persian literature on mysterious Russian каганате. Main ethnos of this military trading
The main ethnos of this military trading state Collums lodging in upper courses and Don sarmato-alany, made made considerable impact on Slavic tribes and formation of the Old Russian state. The earth of Russian каганата after his death entered into a kernel of Kievan Rus', having left Slavs the name "Russia". (Galkin E.S.« Secrets of Russian каганата». Moscow. Veche. 2002гС. 429). It is respectively easy to assume that the same of the Sarmatian – аланы played a certain role in formation of pre-Christian religious views of Russian people which, however, and without that bore in itself bases of Indo-European spiritual culture, that on which created also assovsky religious tradition. Confirmations to this assumption can be found in bylinas of Russian and Slavic people kept many subject parallels with nartsky narrations. In Russian oral tradition direct mentions of communication of alansky and Russian religious cultures remained also. In the bylina "The story about the Golden vessel", we read:" Rus (the mythical founder of the Russian State), chosen from the colleagues in the leader, left it and followed with the numerous people.... Asparukh, his father, incessantly practised in mysterious sciences. He tried to find means to an uchineniye of the people invincible, and on this end in approach of a great Russian horde to Alania, he left uphill Alan where started to work about the intention.
... Divine Light возблистал окрест throne; attendants of it sang of praises to the immortal...« Listen the father руссов, It broadcast to Asparukh, heavens patronize your jealousy of your fatherland; the destiny defines fearlessness and victories to participation of your people. It will subdue the countries in which strides, all North and parts of the East, the South and the West will undergo its power; other countries and people вострепещут uniform name. I always will be the patron of his wreath and a golden vessel, доколь princes Russian will get married this wreath, доколь will keep laws mysteriously ordered in it, the power and their sword won't hesitate for a time, but your fatherland when they from them will evade will rise. Their wreath will run into hands alien, fight of confusion will cover a face of nice Slovene area, and this will be time when it should it be subverted. However I will always erect it from its chayemy ruins. The golden vessel storing destiny руссов, will hold overweight against predators of this wreath»". (Ancient wonders т.3, book 1 Magically powerful stories of the 18th eyelid. M, Soviet Russia. 1991С.254).
On the basis of the aforesaid it is possible to draw a conclusion that wisdom of those aristocratic pre-Christian beliefs which source in «alansky mountains», most likely and was a spiritual basis in consciousness of Russian magicians which, in turn, could affect strongly the Holy Fathers comprehending true understanding of Spirit far from temples and bible interpretation, having moved away from noise of the cities and having remained alone with the nature. For this reason svyatootechesky Orthodoxy doesn't find a support in Bible culture and is compelled to exist
it is compelled to exist in fight against internal contradictions. On the other hand, it is necessary to understand that world outlook "pictures" are very convenient to the Christian clergy earning on them. After all, if God is ubiquitous, it is impossible to justify construction of "houses" for God if It in everything, it is impossible to explain functions of intermediaries between It and simple people if he loves the creation and isn't vindictive how to explain concept «God's fear»? Besides, the contradiction which arises in consciousness of the believer from the conflict between visual images and ideological formulas, generates sense of guilt that is convenient for the pastors aspiring to psychological enslavement of masses, but isn't acceptable for the people who are guided by comprehension of integrity and self-sufficiency of God and the person - to what the pure religious tradition should conduct that. By the way, we will remind of one Judaic custom described both in the Torah, and in the Bible:« Also Aaron both hands will assign to the head of a live goat, and professes over them all lawlessness of sons of Izrailevs both their all crimes and their all sins, and will assign to the head of a goat and will send with the courier the person to the desert. The goat on itself also will incur all lawlessness them to the earth impassable, and it will start up a goat to the desert». (Levynite 16; 21,22) This custom, obviously, existed for removal of cargo of fault. Probably, Judaic priests well understood malignancy of this feeling for mentality of the person.
Thus, all aforesaid allows to come to the following conclusions:
A.Osetinskaya religious culture is complete and consistent in the aspiration to help person to realize his unity from all Universe. In it the highest divine world, and also experience of communication constructed on its basis with all live beings, including and Basic spiritual and psychological Elements of management reveals executed sacrality, restraint, internal advantage.
B. Christian ideas of God are inconsistent and broken off, that they eclectically unite images of gods, opposite each other: bible God who is initially detached from the creation and drevneariysky - uniform with the creation. Besides, if to speak about Christianity sources, the Bible, initially leaning on the Torah, doesn't adhere to its primary contents, the major principles, ideas and images.
Вход
FAQ
Поиск
MEN'S BELT